Activists with Ajinomoto’s “Redefine CRS” campaign claim fears related to monosodium glutamate (MSG) are rooted not in health, but racism.
WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. health officials will ban most flavored e-cigarettes popular with underage teenagers, but with major exceptions that benefit vaping manufacturers, retailers and adults who use the nicotine-emitting devices.
Although it said it would take six months to roll out, the FDA updated its website stating tobacco use and sales is now illegal to anyone under 21.
The FDA is no longer able to ignore the benefits of psilocybin and has granted “breakthrough therapy” status to this medicine to treat depression.
The FDA magically turned our cells into “drugs” in 2006 by changing one word in 21 CFR 1271
No reliable scientific evidence exists to prove “transgender” children benefit from impersonating the opposite sex or puberty blockers.
The FDA has documented thousands of deaths linked to the puberty blockers now given to children who suffer from gender dysphoria.
More Americans use products infused with cannabidiol (CBD) than use marijuana or other illegal drugs, according to a Gallup poll.
The comparison, although imprecise, indicates how swiftly CBD, one of marijuana’s active ingredients, has risen in prominence despite a lack of scientific understanding or careful regulation of the substance.
Recent Stories in Issues
CBD products are suddenly everywhere — a search of Amazon, for example, reveals more than 9,000 options. Americans can now buy CBD sodas, soaps, cocktails, and even dog treats. “Holistic” or “all natural” vendors of CBD products routinely tout their supposed medical benefits, often with no scientific backing and outsized promises, such as curing cancer.
The Gallup poll released Wednesday found that 14 percent of U.S. adults, roughly one in seven, “personally use CBD products.” Half of respondents said they do not use CBD, while another 35 percent said they were “not familiar” with CBD products.
Although 14 percent may not seem like much, in practice this means that by some measures, CBD is more widely consumed by the adult population than any illegal drug, including marijuana.
The National Survey on Drug Use and Health, a federal survey administered by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, generally considers a person a user if he or she reports having used a substance in the past month. Comparing rates of past-month use in the 2017 NSDUH (the most recent available year) to the rate of CBD use identified by Gallup indicates that CBD is more popular than all the major illicit drugs combined, outpaced only by past-month use of cigarettes and alcohol.
That popularity is driven in large part by young people. Twenty percent of respondents under 30 reported using CBD products, compared to 16 percent of those between 30 and 49, 11 percent of those between 50 and 64, and 8 percent of those over 65. This trend actually matches the popularity of marijuana: 24 percent of Americans aged 18 to 25 are past-month ganja users, compared to 9 percent over the age of 25.
The two sources of data compared above are imperfectly analogous. It is likely, for example, that rates of marijuana use have increased somewhat over the past 18 months, while rates of cigarette use have likely declined slightly. Still, the comparison sheds some light on the rapid rise of CBD, in spite of the fact that much remains to be understood about the drug’s possible effects, and extent to which it requires regulatory oversight.
CBD is one of the active ingredients in marijuana; tetrahydrocannabinol, a.k.a THC, is the other main one. Most CBD sold on the open market, however, is derived from hemp. The substance’s explosion in popularity stems from one legal change: the 2018 Farm Bill, which legalized the cultivation of hemp and removed it from the harshest schedule of controlled substances, thereby permitting the production of CBD goods.
Importantly, the actual sale of CBD products for therapeutic purposes is still basically illegal unless approved by the Food and Drug Administration, which has only signed off on a single CBD-derived drug. CBD in non-medical applications, like food, is legal. But the rapid legalization of CBD production, combined with the FDA’s lack of enforcement resources, have created an impossible regulatory situation. The result is de facto legalization, with little regulatory oversight, and a market full of questionable health and safety claims.
“The FDA is being pushed by all sides to act quickly,” former FDA head Scott Gottlieb wrote in a recent op-ed. “Meanwhile, responsible food makers waiting for regulators to address the legal and safety considerations before launching CBD products are being eclipsed by unscrupulous purveyors.”
CBD almost certainly has medical benefits — it has been approved for treatment of epilepsy, and further research is currently being conducted on its applications to Parkinson’s disease, schizophrenia, diabetes, multiple sclerosis, and anxiety. But the drug has risks, too: human trials have identified “hepatic abnormalities, diarrhea, fatigue, vomiting, and somnolence” as side effects, while animal studies have found side effects including changes to hypotension, central nervous system toxicity, and harms to the male reproductive system.
All of this research barely scratches the scientific surface.
“We need more research but CBD may be prove to be an option for managing anxiety, insomnia, and chronic pain,” Dr. Peter Grinspoon wrote at the blog of Harvard Medical School. “Without sufficient high-quality evidence in human studies we can’t pinpoint effective doses, and because CBD is currently is [sic] mostly available as an unregulated supplement, it’s difficult to know exactly what you are getting.”
In other words, there just is not enough settled science to know what CBD really does. Gottlieb seems to agree: In his op-ed, he called for the FDA to expedite approval of certain CBD products, while putting the onus on firms to study the potential toxicity of CBD additives.
Either way, the survey data make clear that CBD use is becoming mainstream and will likely be a top priority for whoever replaces Gottlieb in the FDA’s top job.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published on Monday a voluntary multi-state recall of produce by Grower’s Express after potentially deadly bacteria was discovered.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration released a list of dog food brands Thursday that could potentially lead to canine heart disease.
The FDA has announced that “Pillsbury Best 5-Pound Bread Flour” has been recalled for possible E.coli contamination.
Conflict of interest between FDA, CDC undermining children’s health
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has issued a mass recall of several tattoo inks containing dangerous bacteria.
According to a recent study, health apps aimed at helping users quit smoking and beat depression are selling user data to the Masters of the Universe at Facebook and Google.
Amid ever-rising prescription drug costs, a bill working its way through the Florida state legislature is the latest effort to use Canadian prescription drugs to cap prices.
The idea, which would tie American prices to Canada’s capped rates, is increasingly popular even among Republicans. However, critics have voiced concerns, worrying that what seems like an easy, safe proposal could actually open yet another floodgate of dangerous drugs into the United States.
The high price of prescription drugs is a perennial challenge for policymakers and consumers alike. Although more than 80 percent of prescriptions filled in the United States are for generics, the remaining 20 percent of brand-name prescriptions contribute to America spending more on healthcare than most of the rest of the developed world. A 2016 study indicated that per capita prescription drug spending in the United States was more than twice that of 19 other industrialized nations, thanks largely to the high cost of brand-name drugs.
Among those other nations is America’s northern neighbor, where government regulators set an upper bound on some pharmaceutical prices. Importation takes advantage of this disparity: By essentially creating a common market for drugs, the argument goes, U.S. prices will be driven down to Canadian levels.
This idea is commonly associated with the left—Sen. Bernie Sanders (I., Vt.), for example, has long been a supporter. As drug prices continue to rise, Republicans have grown more willing to consider government action. Sens. Josh Hawley (R., Mo.) and Rick Scott (R., Fla.) have floated a bill to cap prescription drug prices, while Sen. Chuck Grassley (R., Iowa) has his own bipartisan drug importation proposal with Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D., Minn.).
This new Republican interest in importation extends to the state level. The push for drug importation in Florida is being led by Gov. Ron DeSantis (R., Fla.) along with Republican leaders in the State House. And, DeSantis claimed in February, he has the support of President Donald Trump to do so.
The Florida bill still needs to pass the state Senate, as well as garner the approval of the Department of Health and Human Services (a requirement of the 2003 Medicare Modernization Act). But if it does, it will set up the second program for drug importation in the nation (Vermont’s own bill passed last year, but is still awaiting HHS approval). Twelve other state legislatures are considering their own proposals.
What the Florida program would look like in practice, however, is a little bit unclear. The bill text charges an as-of-yet-unspecified “vendor” with identifying a list of drugs which the state would benefit from importing; identifying Canadian suppliers that meet Canadian government standards; and confirming that imported drugs meet FDA standards for safety, generate cost-savings, and are not controlled or otherwise illegal substances. The House version of the bill also includes a more general license, permitting the importation of drugs from other countries where the federal government acknowledges good manufacturing practices, although it does not appear in the Senate version.
Although the bill lays out strict requirements as to the quality of Canadian pharmacies and drugs, critics fear that the actual realities of regulatory oversight—especially in the hand of an as-yet-unnamed private vendor—will simply be too challenging to manage responsibly.
George Karavetsos, a former director of the FDA’s Office of Criminal Investigations, used to be responsible for assessing the security and integrity of drug supply chains. In his view, the decision to place oversight of the new Canadian drug supply chain in the hands of an unspecified, non-governmental entity could be a disastrous mistake.
“The bill is requiring a vendor to step in the shoes of the FDA to ensure the safety of the drugs coming in,” Karavetsos told the Free Beacon. “Florida has decided to delegate the awesome responsibility that the FDA has to protect the American public, and in this case Floridians, with a vendor.”
Importantly, while the vendor would rely on Canadian certification to determine if a pharmacy is legitimate, the Canadian government itself would play no role in the actual importation of drugs. The burden of managing the state’s drug supply—which, given porous between-state borders, could rapidly become the nation’s drug supply—would be in the hands of a single vendor.
What is more, Karavetsos said, the drugs themselves would almost necessarily need to come from non-Canadian sources. That is because the Canadian market, which serves 37 million people, already suffers from shortages: about 1,000 annually between 2010 and 2017. The addition of Florida’s 21 million-person population to that market could only exacerbate the problem.
“Canada’s pharmaceutical industry is already strained trying to serve the relatively small Canadian market, never mind serving more than 300 million American consumers,” a former Canadian Minister of Health wrote in 2017.
Asked about this concern, the Florida bill’s sponsor Rep. Tom Leek responded, “I don’t think it matters. I don’t think it’s an excuse not to try.”
However, there is a real risk that it would matter, in that Canada would likely come to serve as a transshipment point for pharmaceuticals made in China or India, which often fail FDA standards of quality. This is especially the case for online pharmacies: The FDA recently cited one, CanaRX, for selling “unapproved, misbranded and unsafe” drugs to Americans.
This concern with supply chain integrity is what has led law enforcement officers to oppose drug importation in the past. Former FBI director Louis Freeh found that there was an “overwhelming consensus” among law enforcement that drug important would lead to an “increased flow of potentially illegitimate pharmaceutical products entering the U.S. drug supply undetected due to the inability to sufficiently inspect the volume entering the United States.”
Two of these law enforcement officers are Javier Peña and Steve Murphy, former DEA agents who told the Free Beacon they were opposed to drug importation.
“We see these drug distribution networks, we see these criminal organizations all over the world. We’ve seen them do coke, heroin, whatever they can make money in. Now we’re starting to see them smuggle fake pills, fentanyl-laced pills,” Peña said. “They’re gonna see this as an opportunity to get involved with importation of legitimate pharmaceutical pills.”
Such fake pharmaceuticals and supplements already plague the American market under the watchful eye of the DEA and FDA. It is unlikely, in Peña and Murphy’s estimation, that Florida and the disinterested Canadian government would fare better.
The post Florida Wants to Import Canadian Drugs; Critics Fear Safety Risks appeared first on Washington Free Beacon.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported on Monday that 626 cases of measles had been reported in 22 states.
Reportedly has no records of clinical trial data
“The lack of insight that continues to be exhibited by the agency is in many ways a willful blindness that borders on the criminal.” — top FDA official.